http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showf ... ost6665704

These guys are just hilarious. They wonder why they have 25 buy in losing streaks and why their variance is so high.

WOW. They liked that playing. I stopped reading 2+2 on the first place because those guys made me feel like I was totally clueless....not that I wasnt, but I still cant understand them.

About the hand, does he really thinks that anyone without the K is calling that raise?? Is he right? If so, i'd love to play those stakes someday.

I don't see anything wrong with this.
But I'd want a good read.

Anyway, it's not for low stakes.

"Thanks for the input everyone. The results don't really show if the play was good or not, since villain had a very strangely played AK. Good to know that I'm not totally stupid for trying it though. "

That HAS to be the POTY... He raised from the CO, called a reraise, basically flopped the nuts, and called down on a totally harmless board, to let the PF Reraiser bet himself to death with his AA or KQ or whatever it is he has (which turned out to be dick)...

nh sir...

You dont see anything wrong with it?

Preflop sucks, but whatever...maybe the guy has been raising lite and hes trying to slow him down

Flop....he tries to take it down....although I doubt he would bet that much if he really had a K.

Turn...flat out ignorant. The guy IS NOT folding. Villain raiser preflop..call a very large preflop reraise. The kings didnt scare him on the flop. Either he has a king himself or hes callng down with something like QQ. Hes not folding for $2900 into a $7300 pot after getting this far.

Yes I agree the bet sizing is less than ideal.
I would personally play the hand slightly differently if I chose to do this (which would be seldomly).

Your point seemed to be that in principle this was a bad idea.
But I don't think it is.

fancy play syndrome