Hi, name was J.

Been playing NL poker for about a year when I decided to step up to 100$ NL.
I´m pretty new to PT and these are the first 40k hands I've been playing at this limit, any input or advice are most welcome, felt like I've been playing pretty aggresive and sometimes to aggresive, one of my leaks is clearly to maximize my winnings in any hand. the last 5k hands tho I've been playing more of a TAa game rather than SLAa game and gonna continue with that + the advice I hope to get here for another 60k hands and then analyze the results.

here we go:

-j








p.s. just found this site and think it will be my new poker home, lol.

Your images don't seem to be showing. Try hosting them at and re-posting.

I think it could make sense for No Limit. In full ring games, especially ones that are loose & passive before the flop, there are plenty, plenty of hands that have good implied odds and are worth limping in with. Yet, in SH games, all of those hands go out the window. Plus, in NLcash games its not nearly as important to steal blinds, so just raising any junk to steal blinds is probably not +ev even for SH NL games. In short, maybe he likes to limp with a lot of small hands in full-ring games.

Surely the stats need to be separated to make more sense, 6 max and Fr are different disciplines, the stats will vary quite a bit. They are useless lumped together like this

Ops ye I can understand the confusion..

OBS !

All games are table of 6 MAX !

OBS !

As the others said, VP from SB looks way to high.

Also, it looks like you're being to aggressive on the river. Maybe trying too hard to get people to fold hands they aren't going to fold?

You're only winning showdowns 60% of the time when you bet or raise the river. Your numbers are similar to mine but I'm winning 82% of the showdowns when I bet or raise the river. Maybe you've valuebetting in situations where you should just be checking?