by Poker Hans » Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:54 am
Thanks for the replies guys, in case you are wondering this is how I played the hand.
I tought for quite a while before I checked; I just wasn't convinced that I would get isolation. My all-in raise would have made the pot $1550, giving odds of about 5/2 to call. If one of the early limpers called the other players odds to call would obviously improve considerably. One or two limpers and I'm definately pushing, three I'd probably consider it, imo four or five is dodgy.
So my plan on the flop was to check (unless a ten appeared giving me a set) and see how the betting went. With so many limpers even a low flop like [4 7 8] wouldn't necessarily mean that I was ahead. As it was, the flop came [AK7] the small blind led out with about $400, I instantly folded and one other player called. I'm not sure if checking was the correct move, but under the circumstances with 5 limpers I'm still not convinced putting my tournament on the line would be a wise move either.
For the record, and I'm not saying that this makes it the correct move, I managed to double through a couple of hands later and took another large pot in quick succession. With a healtier chip stack in front of me, I started to steal blinds and soon had the table dominated. I got heads up with a chip lead of about 3:1 and trapped my opponent after about 10 hands to win out.
Just because it worked out for me in this instance, it doesn't neccessarily justify the way I played the hand. I could just have easily gone card dead and pushed with a medicore hand or been blinded out. It does however make the debate on this hand a little more complex......