AA turn pairs top-pair (NL200 6max Stars)
Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
AA turn pairs top-pair (NL200 6max Stars)
by GodlikeRoy » Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:15 pm
Villian was 48/5/1.36 in PT over about 150 hands. He was a losing player. He seemed fairly passive, I didn't think he would raise my river bet here without a king. Does anyone like a larger bet on the river?
What about the turn action? I think leading will fold out PPs whereas check-calling gives him the option to bet a weaker hand. Still, the line seems a bit weird to me, so any thoughts are welcome.
Edit: PFR was meant to be $10, just missed the slider by one notch.
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
-
GodlikeRoy - Posts: 7430
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am
by DoctorHandles » Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:26 pm
If you think he'll bet a PP on the river I like checking the river. If you have to pay a bit extra when he has the K so be it.
If not I like a larger river bet.
If not I like a larger river bet.
The better player should win the race. Always.
-
DoctorHandles - Posts: 2401
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm
by shamdonk » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:53 pm
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
by shamdonk » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:18 am
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
by shamdonk » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:34 am
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
by GodlikeRoy » Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:45 pm
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.
-
GodlikeRoy - Posts: 7430
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:43 am
by shamdonk » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:01 pm
Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
-
shamdonk - Posts: 4279
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
- Location: amherst, MA
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests