I don't bluff very often. Mainly because at Tridonka, know one folds. But I figured this was a decent spot to bluff.

This table has been really active. There are two major fish here. One who is playing 80% of thier hands and overbetting with crap a lot. #2 is a calling station. I am running at like 30/15 on this table the last 25 hands or so. I'm limping in with a lot of hands knowing that I can win a really big pot if I hit something good. (Too bad one of the super fish folded PF on this hand)

The Villain in this hand is UTG, and is running at 45/25 over the last 25 hands I have on him, all coming from this session. He has a double stack, and hasn't proven to me that he is a total donk yet (Except for the lpaying almost half his hands thing)

Villain has $210, HERO has $180, and super donk #2 in the SB has $95.

UTG Villain raises it to $3

I have and just call. Donk#1 folds, Donk#2 in the SB calls, and the BB folds.

I usually muck this PF, but it was a smallish PF bet, and I would have position on everyone except Donk#1 (Who folded PF).

Flop is

That is a decent flop. I have a flush draw to go along with a gutshot. Pot is at $10. SB checks, Villain bets $5. I call, as does the SB

Pot = $25. Turn is the

SB again checks. Villain again only bets $5. That is a really small bet, so I thought this was a good time to raise, so I raise to $18.

SB folds, and villain calls. I probably should have bet more. It's only $13 more for him to call into a $48 pot. Maybe raise to $25 or so sound right?

Pot = $61. River is the

Villain checks. I got nothing. The only way to win this is to bet. His check seems weak to me.

So I bet $30 into the $61.

What do you think of this? bet more on the River? I bet that ammount to make it look like a good solid value bet.

Not a good place to bluff? I would think that he would fold any ace except for the obvious A8 and AK.