This is actually a very good test, a HSNL 2p2er has spent a year developing it and it has proven to be pretty accurate.

Its also useful for spotting your weak areas.

Its quite annoying when it puts you in rubbish situations, but gets you thinking.

100 is average

I scored
em2 got

Remember for real results, make the play that YOU think is best, not what you think they think is best.

This was posted in anything a week or so ago. I got a 130 so I must be better than em2 right? I doubt it.

Dam.. did do a search but nothign came up.

OK found it now

Ok, using the "back" button a few times, I got to my profile--very interesting.

They rate me as a low to mid stakes pro, which is probably about right.

Actually, my blinds score seems to have been the highest percentile, at 99.74%. Not sure exactly how that got there. I think I may have called in the blinds with T5o in the tournament situation, figuring I probably had live cards and had odds. Otherwise, I don't remember what questions would have done much here (I think I also did lots of folding there otherwise).

Then I got a very good percentile on position, at 99.32%. That doesn't surprize me much, actually.

Tournament play, as expected, was low at 84 percentile. Ok, I'm a mediocre tournament player and already knew that.

I apparently played my big pairs reasonably well with a percentile there of 98%. Oddly, I was in the same percentile for small and medium pairs, but they didn't view that as exceptionally better than my average score (Big pairs got 77% and small-medium 76%).

On bluffing, I was worse than average for my overall score--again not surprizing. There, I was in the 92 percentile, but only rated 66%.

I was very good at flop texture (I think that's largely due to Omaha), again higher than normal.

I won't go through the rest, although computational speed (not surprizingly, since I thought quite a bit) was really low at 18% !!! (there, I was in the 2 percentile!).

Looking at things more in order, from strengths to weaknesses, here's what I get:

Blinds (best score of all at 86%)
Position (82%)
Hand selection (83%)
Logic (79%)
Flop texture (78%)
Betting patterns (78%)
Big pairs (77%)
Smaller pairs (76%)
Aggression (76%)
Bluffing (66%)
Tourney (61%)
Speed (18%)

Hmmm... I'm not really worried about speed or tourneys so much, but I do wonder where exactly the "room for improvement" is on big pairs, smaller pairs, and aggression is.

With bluffing, I know there's a lot of room for improvement, and I probably should think about it more. It just seems like in most of the games I play there are SO many more bad calls than bad laydowns that I like to keep the bluffs pretty rare.

IMy score was 125,

My tournament play is poor but I play big and small pairs well, my positional play is average and I should consider myself a low to mid-stakes pro....

I'm also strong with betting patterns and logic.

interesting.