Stealing, hit a hand vs two LAGs - 400NL 6max

by **black_knight6** » Sat May 12, 2007 6:26 pm

Both have <10 CCPF values, so I usually feel pretty safe stealing against them.

[Ac]

[9h] OTB 4 handed, I open raise to 16, both blinds call.

Flop [Jh]

[9d][2h] Pot 48. We check through.

Normally I CB a very very high % of the time...but I check because I want to see what happens on the turn (I'm calling a lot of bets on the turn).

Turn [Jh]

[9d][2h][9s] Pot 48. SB leads 21, BB calls...I call. Thoughts?

River [Jh]

[9d][2h][9s][5c] Pot 111. They both check...I bet 83.

Thoughts?

by **hard2tel** » Sat May 12, 2007 6:50 pm

by **shamdonk** » Sat May 12, 2007 6:59 pm

by **ua1176** » Sat May 12, 2007 8:27 pm

by **kennyg** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:04 pm

by **Schuster** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:16 pm

by **Triple B** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:53 pm

by **kennyg** » Sun May 13, 2007 6:58 am

by **iceman5** » Sun May 13, 2007 7:02 am

I agree with Kenny and would bet that flop and would rather check with AJ because there are less overcards to your pair.

Anyone who advocates checking the flop surely has to advocate raising the turn for the same reason. They are LAGs and might want to mix it up with you on ths board. Its hard to believe you have a 9. RAISE!!!!!

by **kennyg** » Sun May 13, 2007 7:06 am

ohhhh... lag is in the subject title.. i didn't see that. checking seems a lot better now. i only saw the CCPF <10% before and assumed they were passive.

by **black_knight6** » Sun May 13, 2007 9:34 am

by **shobute** » Sun May 13, 2007 12:35 pm

by **Notorious_JC** » Sun May 13, 2007 12:47 pm

by **ua1176** » Sun May 13, 2007 5:59 pm

by **paulee** » Sun May 13, 2007 6:01 pm

Stealing, hit a hand vs two LAGs - 400NL 6max

Stealing, hit a hand vs two LAGs - 400NL 6max

Who is online

Who is online