$2/$5 Live....

2 limpers and I raise to $30 with [9d] on the button. 1 limper who is getting real tired of me and is pretty solid calls. He is solid TAG. I havent seen him bluff anyone. Just plays his cards for their value but does it well.

Pot $70. Flop [6d][3d]. He checks and I bet $50. He calls.
Pot $170. Turn . He checks and I check behind.
Pot $170. River . He checks. Whats the standard play from a LAG here? Value bet? $100?

Regardless of your image, this seems like an easy value bet - I think you get looked up by all sorts of crap.

D

Agreed. He almost never has a king here no matter what your image is. Therefore, you should value bet.

edit: and you will get called by so many random holdings such as lower PPs, Ax, bottom pair, etc.

Solid = shitty. Shitty = will call with a any pair. You can beat any logical pair he could have, thus you bet, scoop pot, laugh at him for being "solid", etc. etc.

The problem with the TAG 'tag' is that he might just be playing a King very passive against you here. I actually see this alot at the live games I play; if a TAG notices that someone will keep betting for them, they will check/ call all day with the best hand. The passiveness of the live tight player is not to be underestimated.

Having said that, I still like a bet here over a check, mainly because of your read on opponent and image.

This is the same villain who check raised me on the river in the other hand I posted here.
forum/viewtopic.php?t=24666

He checked quads to me on three streets and then check raised the river. Is this still a river bet / fold to a check raise? Or even more so, after seeing that hand results?