I think it's probably so close to neutral ev that it doesn't matter, and only increases variance. If he didn't raise the flop with
then I really doubt he's bet/3betting the turn with it often at all. Still, even with this in his range (as well as KTc, ATc, JQ) as well as made hands we beat or draw with (JT, J9, T9) it's only a little +EV for us (we are getting 3.4 : 1 on the call and our equity is about 34%). Remove the drawing hands and some combinations of QJ and it's -EV.. so yeah, it's close, and I don't think either of us can conclude one way or another that it's much better to call or fold. If we raise his turn bet to $300 and he shoves, it seems like a call, whereas if we raise to $230 or so and he shoves, we can fold. The fact that he's passive makes it less likely imo that he's bet/3betting a draw or weak hand on the turn and more likely that he slowplayed a big hand on the flop and is getting the money in now. This is what would make me lean towards a fold, but after playing around with hand ranges I agree that calling would be fine too.
Of course I think 90% of the time he will either fold or call your raise, so it's almost kinda pointless discussing what to do when he shoves since this situation will occur so rarely.
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.