SH v LH

by **julianDS** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:25 pm

Hi guys, just wanted to know how you perceive the differences between the two disciplines?

I love LH (because I'm running at 2.3/100 over 10K hands and new to the game, i.e just five months playing) but I can't get my head around SH (0.75/100 over 5K)

Seems to me, SH is way too loose. Even at what I call high levels (5/10) I just find SH populated by absolute maniacs.

Not looking for advice; Sklansky is my God

but I hate SH and NL with equal passion, I just wanted some expert thoughts to mull over.

by **redhouse** » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:39 pm

by **julianDS** » Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:54 am

[quote="redhouse"]well you hate NL so your hearts in the right place.

Unfortunately, that's where the money seems to be. I gritted my teeth today and dropped into one of my regular online cardrooms. Had a couple of hours in one $50 max buy in room. Playing a very tight, (by limit standards anyway) I left with a dollar less than 3 times the buyin.

Playing what I'll call passive counter attacking. Didn't enjoy playing, but even playing that way worse limit players than me will make a lot of money playing multiple rooms. Better limit players than me, probably 50% of all players who've been playing over a year or so, will need to employ a money counter!

You don't get returns like these playing limit. Well I don't anyway

by **antneye** » Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:08 am

SH v LH

SH v LH

Who is online

Who is online