No real reads

Hand #1201011292000341: Melbourne 11292
Seat 1: shelback
Seat 2: Howie X
Seat 3: crimson12
Seat 4: RandomCaller
Seat 5: post1958
Seat 6: afcwimbledon (Drunken Brit who didnt play this hand)
Seat 7: Uplay2Lose
Seat 8: *SxcAngel*
Seat 9: antneye
Seat 10: $hadow
crimson12: posts small blind $1.50
RandomCaller: posts big blind $3
Dealt to antneye ,
post1958: folds, afcwimbledon: folds, Uplay2Lose: folds,*SxcAngel*: folds,antneye: raises to $6, $hadow: raises to $9,shelback: folds,Howie X: folds,crimson12: folds,RandomCaller: folds,antneye: calls

*** FLOP *** , ,
antneye: checks,$hadow: bets $3, antneye: calls

*** TURN ***
antneye: checks,$hadow: bets $6,antneye: raises to $12,$hadow: raises to $18
antneye: raises to $24,$hadow: calls

*** RIVER ***
antneye: bets $6, $hadow: calls

I'm thinking your line is right on. He would raise this with AJo+ and TT+, thinking you may be taking a shot at the blinds from afar. I like your line, I don't think you can let up anywhere.

Running this through pokerstove, Given above ranges, and dropping AA and QQ on the river since he wouldn't flat call we see these equities:

PF: 41%
Flop: 82%
Turn: 73%
River: 79% (and if we discount AQ, it goes upto 92%)

So even given the fair chance that you are beat given his possible holdings, your equity is great enough to offset this risk post flop. I would not at all be surprised to see AK or AJs Here.

I play it exactly the same way. Seems pretty standard.

?