villan is 40/2 over like 30 hands, so no realy reads.

Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (6 handed) Courtesy of

CO ($400)
Button ($596)
SB ($658.10)
Hero ($450)
UTG ($403.80)
MP ($330.40)

Preflop: Hero is BB with , .
3 folds, Button calls $4, SB completes, Hero checks.

Flop: ($12) , , (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $12, Button calls $12, SB folds.

Turn: ($36) (2 players)
Hero bets $28, Button raises to $72, Hero ????

Another weird spot. I would assume a 40/2 player sucks and may have passive tendencies. The problem is your sample size is too small to figure out his range here.

So I would say he should show up with 66 rarely, 99 rarely, Q9 a lot, but also may show up with a draw or KQ/QJ/Q4s sometimes. A donk may even have AA/KK here and think its the nuts.

I kinda want to let this go but I would probably call and re-evalute river. I might block the river. Honestly though I doubt you lose a lot by just folding here and waiting for a better read/better spot.

I think this answer kinda sucks but without even some semblance of a read you could have the nuts or be drawing almost dead.

Honestly, minimum re-raising here probably is a pretty cheap way to figure out what the fuck is up and make the river easier to play.

But Triple B's idea of calling and re-evaluating the river is generally what I'd do if I wasn't feeling fancy.