Turn makes it an easy fold, but I still say raise the flop...and it's NOT to avoid 'tough decisions' it's because I think it's the best EV play here.

I think raising the flop does both. I still prefer a fold though.

If villain doesn't have an Ace, why is the turn an easy fold?

On the flop by raising all we do is let him fold worse and raise/call with better hands, No future money will be put in from our opponent if we are ahead.

Flop he leads into us. Well u would think that AA,QQ,AQ,KQ or 55 he would have C/R or ck-call as he would not want us to possibly fold as it woudl lose value. So on the flop the call is best and lets put him on a range of 66-JJ.

Turn. What hand that we put him of PF has an Ace in it? Do we change our read as the board gets scarier? This still looks like air to me. If i had to guess I would say 99-JJ. If he did have an Ace he would check here fearing a WA/WB scenario and look to check-call and reeval on turn. The only hand that bets this is a Q and we already detemined by our read he doesnt have one.

Call/shove seems best. Acutally, shove. If we get to the river we are not going to get any more money out of him. He will always fold a worse hand and always call with a better hand, hell he may even fire another barrell (which we cant call). We also do not have any showdown value (checking if he checks the river.