ya, cuz you prolly don't have implied odds

At the time I'd prolly call and let him bluff the river, then shove.

He left after this hand so still dont know if hes good or not.

As I said, I shoved. He called with 87s. I rivered the flush.

I did think he could have 2 pair or a set, but thought he might fold those to my all in. I would push there with a flush.

It's because of the stop n go...I think he has 2pr+ every time here.

Yeah, I think the read of 2 pair+ is about dead on, and the question becomes how much fold equity you have. Also, if he has a set, you should have not only 0 fold equity but also are drawing really thin.

I can't remember the exact sequence well enough to say whether there's any reason to think 2 pair rather than set. If I were villain anyway, I'd probably fold 2 pair here but call with set--although I haven't seen you play and could even call with 2 pair if you're playing that way excessively.

I do think your frequent pushes, since they do seem from what you've posted well thought out, have quite a bit of meta-game value.

Yes, but not THAT much more to fold one but not the other given Ice's shove.