My limited stats on SimplyWicked have him as a LAG.

230 hands, 57% VP$IP, 22.2% PFR, AF 3.0, 13 Big Blinds/100

SW's LAG style paid off big this time, but can this pre-flop play really be justified even for a LAG? I'm guessing that ULKYFCNSCKRU was trying to take SW off his LAG game -- but can ULKYFCNSCKRU 's style be justified as a +EV response to a LAG.

Can it be +EV to try to out-LAG a LAG, or is it better just to bide your time and wait for a monster?

Any other comments on this hand?



***** Hand History for Game 2513523214 *****
$100 PL Omaha Hi/Lo - Wednesday, August 10, 21:34:02 EDT 2005
Table Table 48874 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 8
Seat 2: stormclouds ( $99 )
Seat 3: SimplyWicked ( $173.11 )
Seat 4: stoogeone ( $100 )
Seat 5: Lazit ( $99.25 )
Seat 6: ULKYFCNSCKRU ( $87.55 )
Seat 7: OrdinaryFly ( $17.50 )
Seat 8: pokerscience ( $80 )
Seat 9: leiparty ( $150.15 )
SimplyWicked posts small blind [$0.50].
stoogeone posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Lazit calls [$1].
ULKYFCNSCKRU calls [$1].
OrdinaryFly folds.
pokerscience folds.
leiparty raises [$2].
stormclouds folds.
SimplyWicked raises [$4.50].
stoogeone folds.
Lazit calls [$4].
ULKYFCNSCKRU raises [$22].
leiparty folds.
SimplyWicked calls [$18].
Lazit folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ Js, 9c, Jh ]
SimplyWicked checks.
panahay has joined the table.
ULKYFCNSCKRU bets [$51.30].
SimplyWicked raises [$102.60].
ULKYFCNSCKRU folds.
SimplyWicked shows [ Jc, 6s, Jd, Qs ] four of a kind, jacks.
SimplyWicked wins $204.90 from the main pot with four of a kind, jacks.
There was no qualifying low hand.

First, I don't believe in giving free cards in Omaha as a standard policy. BUT WHY RAISE IN THIS SITUATION??????????

There is no low draw (or even a backdoor low draw) and the only thing that will most likely beat you is a runner runner Aces for him to get quads. I will take my chances and see if someone can catch up.

Tom

hard to see here, but ULKY only had $13 left, so it was really not that big of a deal -- the bulk of the money was in the pot.

regardless of the money behind, good point.