To me I thought it was, since I was a 3:1 dog in the hand, the pot was laying me 2:1 and that I can also win at least a bet the size of the pot on the flop if he folds to my all in check raise.
It's pretty obvious Omaha isnt my number 1 game, so can you please comment for me?
(hand converter not working)
Table 'Tea' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Villain($284.60 in chips)
Seat 2: xxxx($41 in chips)
Seat 3: xxxx($94.65 in chips)
Seat 4: xxxx($36.50 in chips)
Seat 6: xxxx($40 in chips)
Seat 7: xxxx($61.70 in chips)
Seat 8: xxxx($96 in chips)
Seat 9: stunnersuh ($116.25 in chips)
xxxx: posts small blind $0.50
xxxx: posts big blind $1
xxxx: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to stunnersuh [6d 3d 5d 6c]
xxxx: raises $1 to $2
xxxx: calls $1
xxxx: calls $2
xxxx: calls $2
stunnersuh: calls $2
Villain: raises $13.50 to $15.50
xxxx: folds
xxxx: folds
xxxx: folds
xxxx: folds
xxxx: folds
xxxx: folds
stunnersuh: calls $13.50
*** FLOP *** [3s 5h Jd]
stunnersuh: checks
Villain: bets $38.50
stunnersuh: raises $62.25 to $100.75 and is all-in
Villain: calls $62.25
*** TURN *** [3s 5h Jd]
*** RIVER *** [3s 5h Jd 2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
stunnersuh: shows [6d 3d 5d 6c] (two pair, Fives and Threes)
Villain: mucks hand
stunnersuh collected $239 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $242 | Rake $3
Board [3s 5h Jd 2h Kd]
Seat 1: Villain(button) mucked [6s Ad As 3h]
Seat 9: stunnersuh showed [6d 3d 5d 6c] and won ($239) with two pair, Fives and Threes