I am occasionally delving into the NL games from time to time as a change of pace from my normal limit games. I played a hand today that I thought perhaps I could have played different to extract some more $$ but haven't decided as of yet how I might have played it to do so. Both players that are involved are fairly predictable players that play "good cards". I called the reraise of my bet because I figured I could break one or both of them with a good flop for my "bad cards". II got a dynamite flop and I am sure that neither had an A the way the hand went down which was very unfortuante. Any comments appreciated.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed)
MP3 ($111.85)
CO ($77.50)
Button ($74.95)
SB ($238.85)
BB ($196.05)
UTG ($89.80)
Hero ($176.50)
MP1 ($100)
MP2 ($98.50)
Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with
,
.
UTG calls $1,
Hero raises to $4, MP1 calls $4,
1 fold,
MP3 raises to $13,
4 folds, UTG folds, Hero calls $9, MP1 calls $9.
Flop: ($41.50)
,
,
(3 players)
Hero checks, MP1 checks,
MP3 bets $11,
Hero raises to $22, MP1 folds, MP3 calls $11.
He makes a VERY weak bet into a 41.00 pot. I raised just a little hoping that perhaps the other player or the better might come over the top and I could set them all in and I guess hope that neither held AA. When he just calls my bet I am pretty sure he doesn't have an A and it's going to be hard to get any more from him.
Turn: ($85.50)
(2 players)
Hero bets $89, MP3 folds.
Perhaps a smaller bet was called for here but with another heart out I didn't want a cheap draw that could get me although I think he was likely on an overpair.
Final Pot: $174.50