.50/1.00 NL
This situation occurs on Prima a lot because of the short stacks:

I have $100 stack, opponent has $15

I'm dealt [Qc] on the button. Two limpers...I raise to $4. Both call.

FLOP $12.50
[Jh][4d]

First guy checks, second opponent bets $1. It's to me...what do i do? Opponent who lead out only has $10 left.

What does that situation have to do with short stacks? Your action changes because its a short stack, but I see people betting the min like that all the time even with a big stack.

I put him all in.

I think the all-in would be good if it was headsup. But there is the other limper to contend with and I'm assuming he has an actual stack. Meaning you probably want to be more careful about putting too much money in. Maybe a raise to $5 and go into check-fold mode if first limper comes along, and if he folds and shortstack moves in for $5 more you can call. This way you save yourself a little bit of money if first limper happens to have a Jack.

Ok I thought that was the right play....do you guys even considering folding??

I really don't...I ended up raising enough to get the opponnent all -in. The other limper folded. The opponent called with AJ and domninated me with trip jacks.

Why would you put him all in? I would put in a small raise here, maybe to 4, then if he comes back, then you give yourself room to fold.
2nd I may just consider calling. a lot of the time you will have the best hand, and if a scare card comes up for his small 2 pair on the flop then you can outplay him and try to make him fold his hand. But if he leads off and bets again, then you're likely beat.

Suhleafs the problem here is if you raise to $5 and the short stack goes all in for another $5 you are now getting 5:1 on your money you call that even if all you have is the gutshot. I think Kenny played the hand correctly and just got out flopped.