Advanced search

Playing for the sidepot, take 2

The action game..

Moderators: Felonius_Monk, briachek, LPF Police Department

Playing for the sidepot, take 2

Postby briachek » Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:35 am

***** Hand History for Game 2924856037 *****
0/0 Omaha Game Table (PL) - Sun Feb 19 19:06:49 EST 2006
Table Table 36722 (Real Money) -- Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: briachek1 ( $26.35)
Seat 2: wei0503 ( $10.25)
Seat 3: shysterone ( $4.80)
Seat 4: bennettatbu1 ( $9.80)
Seat 5: bvanderhave ( $31.80)
Seat 6: IGambleU ( $16.70)
Seat 7: UpTown_ ( $11.30)
Seat 8: pirate77111 ( $28.45)
Seat 9: perezcabysta ( $106.20)
Seat 10: floyd2100 ( $23.65)
IGambleU posts small blind (0.10)
UpTown_ posts big blind (0.25)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to briachek1 [ Qd, Kd, Ah, Jd ]
pirate77111 folds.
perezcabysta calls (0.25)
floyd2100 folds.
briachek1 calls (0.25)
wei0503 folds.
shysterone calls (0.25)
bennettatbu1 calls (0.25)
bvanderhave calls (0.25)
IGambleU folds.
UpTown_ checks.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6d, 5c, Td ]
UpTown_ checks.
perezcabysta checks.
briachek1 checks.
shysterone bets (0.25)
bennettatbu1 folds.
bvanderhave calls (0.25)
UpTown_ folds.
perezcabysta folds.
briachek1 calls (0.25)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 2d ]
briachek1 checks.
shysterone bets (0.50)
bvanderhave calls (0.50)
briachek1 calls (0.50)
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
briachek1 checks.
shysterone bets (2)
bvanderhave calls (2)
briachek1 raises (7) to 7
shysterone calls (1.80)
shysterone is all-In.
bvanderhave folds.
Creating Main Pot with $12.80 with shysterone
** Summary **
Main Pot: $12.80 | Side Pot 1: $3.20 | Rake: $0.65
Board: [ 6d 5c Td 2d 8h ]
briachek1 balance $21.55, bet $8, collected $3.20, lost -$4.80 [ Qd Kd Ah Jd ] [ a flush, king high -- Kd,Qd,Td,6d,2d ]
shysterone balance $12.80, bet $4.80, collected $12.80, net +$8 [ Ad 7d Ts 8s ] [ a flush, ace high with ace kicker -- Ad,Td,7d,6d,2d ]

now i was about 80% sure that the short stack had the nut flush. However, the other guy called so he didn't have it so i decided to just try to create a side pot so i could win some extra in case the shortie did have the nut flush.

Ok, this is unlikely to ever be a good move since that guy is now likely to fold his hand, even a lower flush unless he's a huge donk since i'm showing strength. anyone ever this this is a good move? Hell, i could actually be winning the main pot since its just a shortie who could have a crap hand.
Brian [Js][9s]
Anyone who gets in a fair fight, has no tactical skills.
User avatar
briachek
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Ewing, NJ

Postby Felonius_Monk » Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:43 pm

No, I don't think the other guy is going to call a raise, given that you hold the cards for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th nut flush and the short stack according to your read has the nut.

The only time I ever like this play is if you are making it as a value play against the short stack, in which case I'd probably just raise 2. However, as you thought he had the nut flush anyway, you'd need a very specific set of circumstances (i.e. fairly sure shorty has the nut and the other guy is a VERY loose passive station) to make the raise for the sidepot.

Sometimes you can make good money by getting creative with sidepots, not sure this is one though.

On a related note, it is very important in PLO to watch out for flush hands where you also hold cards to 2nd and 3rd nut flushes, as they are BIG blockers to you getting paid (as to some extent your 3rd and 4th nut cards were here). I don't like AK suited much at all as a feature as you know if you make your flush the best anyone else can have is Q high, and above a certain level people don't call down big bets with such vulnerable hands.
The Monkman J[c]

"Informer, you no say daddy me snow me Ill go blame,
A licky boom boom down.
Detective mon said daddy me snow me stab someone down the lane,
A licky boom boom down." - Snow, 1993
User avatar
Felonius_Monk
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 7243
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:40 am
Location: Yorkshire, UK

Postby briachek » Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:51 pm

yeah i didn't consider that when making the play. Would you consider doing it if you didn't have the Qd and Jd?
Brian [Js][9s]
Anyone who gets in a fair fight, has no tactical skills.
User avatar
briachek
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 6322
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Ewing, NJ

Postby Felonius_Monk » Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:13 pm

I guess, but you'd still need the other guy to be likely to call with a 3rd nut flush or worse, so you'd still need him to be pretty loose.

I guess with the added value of catching another 1.80 from the shorty if he DOESN'T have the nut flush, it might be a nice "either/or" play that carries a combined +EV.
The Monkman J[c]

"Informer, you no say daddy me snow me Ill go blame,
A licky boom boom down.
Detective mon said daddy me snow me stab someone down the lane,
A licky boom boom down." - Snow, 1993
User avatar
Felonius_Monk
Semi Pro (B&M & Online)
 
Posts: 7243
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:40 am
Location: Yorkshire, UK


Return to Omaha

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests