I was afraid someone might ask that...
I don't really have one but was more hoping that exploring how various strong hands hold up might allow us to get there.
One might define "best" the following way:
1) A hand that is ALWAYS favorite regardless of what your opponent has
2) If there is more than one hand fitting criterion 1, then the hand that is the biggest favorite over its closest rival.
You're right that on criterion 2, it would probably be better to have a hand that has the biggest equity over the entire range of possible 54 hands on this board, but that gets really tedious to carry out.
My intention, really, was simply, first, to explore just which redraws are the very strongest and, secondly, to figure out where the boundaries lie on redraws where you still need to call.
I think it's pretty clear that against a tight opponent who raises your nuts, you have to have SOME redraw. But the question that Rhound's hand brought up for me is: Just how much redraw to you need to have? By making it HU here, I wanted to simplify it a bit but still get some idea of the "hierarchy" among various kinds of redraws.
I'll have to double-check your data (which I'm sure is correct since everything else you had corresponds exactly to what I got on the cardplayer calculator), but it's looking like 3456ds is the very best one...
And I don't really see why. True, the 3 takes away boating chances for the AA, but so does 3457. Ok, I think I may see where it's coming from: On 3457, one of the straight improvements also is a flush improvement. So there are only 3 independent straight outs.
With 3456, you still have a 4 or a 5 to make a better straight (hence 4 outs), but the spades are completely independent of that, so that gives you 1 extra out against the AA hand, plus your defensive 3.
Hmmmm... I think that may mean that either 3456 is the best possible hand, or else there really isn't one, because you get 3456 as favorite against certain boats, but certain boats as favorite against 4567, which is in turn a favorite over 3456 (I'll have to check into this one further).