by GodlikeRoy » Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:15 pm
This is a good post and a concept that I think has been lost in recent times only to be replaced by a "play tight as hell early on then aggressive as hell later on" strategy advocated by many. While that probably IS a winning strategy, it's far from optimal. If you take a few opportunities early on to gain a some extra chips (whether it be limping with SCs in LP or calling small raises with PPs, or even stealing a pot when you sense and believe someone to be weak), then not does this only increase your current chipstack but it also allows for you to make more plays in the future, more +EV decisions, and therefore increases your overall EV (both chipEV and $EV) by more than it would seem. If you limp and miss the flop/fold, you'll be a shortstack later on, but not that much shorter than you would've been had you folded the hand preflop. By the time you're short your options are very very limited anyway and the extent of your shortness is not as large a factor/problem as is the fact that you're short.
Poker is silly.
It is not enough to be good at chess, you must also play well.
Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.