by GodlikeRoy » Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:43 am
Call and win (66.2%): 11k in chips v 200k+ v 900 chips.
Call and lose (33.8%): $900
Fold: 1.3k chips v 200k+ chips v 900 chips
If you call and win, assume there is a 90% chance that your friend comes first or second. $12,000 x 0.90 x 0.662 = $7,149.6 EV in calling.
If you call and lose, there is a 100% chance you come third. $900 x 0.338 = $304.2 EV in calling.
Total $EV in calling = $7,453.8
If you fold, assume that the next hand will be a 3way all in (i can't see how the bigstack would fold from the button here). Bri is right in saying that if you OR the button win this hand, you will get second at least and get the seat. Therefore there is a 66.67% chance of getting the seat. $12,000 x 0.667 = $8,004 EV in folding.
If you fold and lose the 3-way all in, you will come third. $900 x 0.33 = $297 EV in folding.
Now assume that the shortstack wins the hand but you have the second best hand, here's where the math gets fuzzy and i'm not sure if i can say this but there's a 33% chance the shortstack wins and IF he wins, there's a 50% chance that you will come second, having some chips remaining (600). The probability of this is 0.33 x 0.50 = 0.165 or 16.5%. Now in this case, the next hand will have the bigstack in the SB and the shortstack still all-in in the BB as he would've only tripled up to 3,000 (900x3 + 100x3). You fold on the button and the bigstack calls the shorty allin. If the bigstack wins which is a 50% chance, you have the seat. $12,000 x 0.165 x 0.5 = $990 EV in folding.
Total $EV in folding = $9,291
You should fold.
Even if you assume a 100% chance of winning if you call and win, your total calling $EV only goes up to $8,248.2 which is still less than what it would be if you folded. The 66.2% chance of winning I assumed is if you're up against a random hand. If you put the opponents range to be tighter, such as any PP, Axs, Kxs and Qxs, you're less of a favourite and this further proves that folding is more profitable.