by Felonius_Monk » Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:54 pm
I find it hard to believe really, given they both make the same number of straights but AAKK will ALWAYS make top set if you hit a set (which isn't the case with AAJJ - i.e. KKQQ has a good chance of winning even if you flop a J).
I suppose one explanation might be that against a random hand drawn from the remaining 48 cards, JJ blocks more hands that have value against aces. That is, if you have AAJJ the JJ in your hand is interfering with (blocking) a wider range of wraps than the KK in AAKK. If this is the case, then I guess AATT should indeed be the nuts as it interferes with more straights (actually, maybe AA99 is better, or maybe there's a point at which the straight-interference value is counterbalanced by the possibility of your set losing to a higher one, and AATT is that point).
However, absolute showdown value isn't the be-all and end-all, so you'd rather have AAKK - AAKK on a KQ5 flop is a lot better than AAJJ on a QJ5 flop! AAKK plays better in a post-flop situation because you know if you set up it'll always be the top one.
The Monkman J[c]
"Informer, you no say daddy me snow me Ill go blame,
A licky boom boom down.
Detective mon said daddy me snow me stab someone down the lane,
A licky boom boom down." - Snow, 1993