I am iceman5... King of LAGs..I call you with ten high

[Aisthesis]

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing as Lee, although with AQ or KQ it also really doesn't matter (hence, not looking doesn't necessarily mean QQ, but makes the call more difficult).

I really think I'd be tempted to call just for the hell of it. It's a pretty decent call if he doesnt' have QQ...

[WayToGo]

[Zwheito]

[iceman5]

[iceman5]

[Zwheito]

Surly I was awere that one of his cards had to be a Q, so yes, I did mean that the other card could be anything from 2 to A.

I don't see how my post is wrong. I just gave examples of how you were doing against two different, and imho, relevant handranges.

You just assumed a different handrange (which is probably more accurate since you knew the player)

Even with the range you assume the call is only barely -EV:

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 35.112% 34.49% 00.63% 41334604 750516.50 { Th8h }
Hand 1: 64.888% 64.26% 00.63% 77025643 750516.50 { QQ, AQs, KQs, Q9s+, AQo, KQo, QTo+ }

If this range is accurate the call cost you about 3.5 $ making this call. That's a small price to pay for the image it generates.

I guess I agree with you; the call was good, but I don't think my previous post was wrong. It just assumed different ranges.

[iceman5]

[Bosox1]

[bocasas]

[Notorious_JC]

[black_knight6]

Learn what's a good price for advertising...that was a good price...it's not to 'protect' your 25, it's to only have to spend 85 (in which you're prolly only 'spending' maybe 40) to keep the party going.

[iceman5]

Well if you want to get technical, I wasnt spending anything since I was getting just about exactly correct odds to call.

[T-Rod]

[iceman5]

All I did was show him my ace. I didnt rub it in his face or anything. I never said a word to him. And yeah, he started to come around the table like he wanted to fight....until I stood up from my chair and then he changed his mind and stormed out.

[MVPSPORTS]