by GlassJoe » Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:19 pm
Because of lack of position is exactly why I advocated moving in PF. It's the bullies like this that overplay the ever loving snot out of Axs. I mentioned that you would, at worst, be a coin flip and that I thought you very well may have him dominated. You did indeed have him dominated, and I think you stand a good chance (roughly 3:1, I suppose) of doubling up early and hopefully being the table captain from here on out. I like playing big hands (AA, KK, QQ and AKs) strong early on, and without position I want to play this hand for all five cards, hence my reasoning for moving in. I don't like calling for the simple fact that if you miss the flop, you're done with the hand because he WILL ABSOLUTELY bet out the flop and take the pot away.
If, however, I did call and hit an A or K, I'm check-raising or check-calling him (depending on how scary the board is) and will try to get all my chips in with TPTK against a guy like this.
Of course, I play at Party, and even though though I've been playing lately at the $100 tables and you start with 1000 chips instead of 800 chips, the blinds are still relatively out of control by the time we're five- or six-handed, and doubling up early is a huge advantage.
There's no way this guy is raising like this with AA and KK. He'd make it much less expensive to get in. That's why I'll push AKs against him, because I'm at worse a "coinflip" and at best (and I'd say more likely) dominating him. He may make a similar raise with 44-88, as well, and even he may be able to get off this hand, though I doubt it. I'm willing to take my chances at him when I'm likely best, though, because he will give his chips away sooner or later.
All of my advice on this hand is based on the prototypical maniac, though, that way overbets and sometimes has a mountain of chips early. I would not play it this way against a reasonable PF raise or a reasonable player.