[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4783: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4785: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4786: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4787: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3888)
NL50: Do you pot control this turn with a set? - Live Poker Forums

Advanced search

NL50: Do you pot control this turn with a set?

Hand analysis. Post your trouble hands here

Moderators: iceman5, LPF Police Department

NL50: Do you pot control this turn with a set?

Postby bdon22 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:23 pm

DH disagrees with the way I played this hand but I actually felt that it was very standard.

$0.25/$0.5 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at

Stacks:
UTG ($54.20)
UTG+1 ($51.30)
CO ($32.68)
Hero ($59.75)
SB ($78.60)
BB ($61.05)

Pre-flop: ($0.75, 6 players) Hero is BTN [4h][4d]
3 folds, Hero raises to $1.75, SB calls $1.5, BB calls $1.25

Flop: [2s][8h][4s] ($5.25, 3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $4, SB folds, BB calls $4

Turn: [Ts] ($13.25, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $10, BB raises to $43.25, Hero folds
User avatar
bdon22
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby black_knight6 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:30 pm

Nope. If he has a flush, nihan him, but I keep betting because there are a tonne of hands that call other than flushes, and I want to charge 1card flush draws...keep betting 100% on this turn.

If it were something like [6s][8s][Th][Js], then I'm much more willing to check behind the turn.
User avatar
black_knight6
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
Location: Victoria BC

Postby DoctorHandles » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:02 pm

Last edited by DoctorHandles on Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby bdon22 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:05 pm

Could you explain, BK?

How is the [Js] and [6s] different than the [Ts]?
If it's the [8s] don't I want to be building the pot in case he has trips or the flush?
And for the [Th] I think I definitely need to be betting this to build pot/protect my hand/get value from draws?
User avatar
bdon22
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby DoctorHandles » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:09 pm

Also BK with your hand I feel very good about getting it in on the turn, not so much with bdons.
The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby black_knight6 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:22 pm

I'd feel worse with 66 in 'my' hand than bdon's 44 hand.

The difference between the two is the existence of many straight draws...your turn card didn't complete any draws, so you're still doing pretty well...
User avatar
black_knight6
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
Location: Victoria BC

Postby DoctorHandles » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:26 pm

I don't fear the Q9.
The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby shamdonk » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:44 pm

Be glad your opponents refuse to fold; if they didn't, you just might go broke.


(9:00:09 PM) GodlikeRoy: i think you could prolly post total shit for the next 2 years aaaaand like 192 days and you'll still be considered 'posting good' cause of your threads that'll never be seen thread
User avatar
shamdonk
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: amherst, MA

Postby DoctorHandles » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:46 pm

The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby black_knight6 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:50 pm

User avatar
black_knight6
Semi Pro (Online)
 
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:51 am
Location: Victoria BC

Postby DoctorHandles » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:54 pm

Ok this is getting a little haphazard, so let me rephrase my point which I guess I didn't make very clear.

If you are bet/folding the turn with a set, checking the turn is usually better.
The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby bdon22 » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:54 pm

I'm a bit lost here. Are we calling his CRAI in the OP?
User avatar
bdon22
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:40 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Postby MVPSPORTS » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:31 am

User avatar
MVPSPORTS
 
Posts: 10141
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: FT. LAUDERDALE, FL

Postby DoctorHandles » Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:59 am

Alright, here it goes. This only applies to sets in position of course, as oop you get it in every time.

Bdon, the standard line as you I'm sure know is to still bet/call the turn when the flush card comes, even if you're oop. In other words, if you had to choose between bet/calling the turn, bet/folding the turn, and checking behind the turn, you would pick bet/calling and it's not close. There are however, some times when you should check behind the turn because it's unlikely your opponent will put more money in the pot when he's behind and his range consists of a ton of flushes.

For example, lets say you opened the CO with [Qc][Qh] and the sb and the bb called. The flop comes [Qs][7s][5d]. The blinds check to you, you bet 85% of the pot and only the SB calls. Turn comes [2s] and the SB checks to you...

This is a check behind almost always. There is only one queen left in the deck, and there aren't many queens in a small blind calling range to begin with. The fact that it's 3 to the flop makes it more likely your opponent is folding hands like [8c][8s] and less likely they'll CR with a draw, as your CB looks stronger so they want the BB to come along as they draw. If you do fire a double barrel here, you're almost always folding out hands like 7x and 55-99 as you yourself could have turned the flush or have AsQx and have them drawing to one out. You're losing almost no value by checking behind, and other than hands like [8c][8s] your opponent has almost no spades in his range. If you do check behind, you give yourself another chance to get value out of hands like 88 on the river and more importantly you give yourself a chance to fill up and stack your opponent if he has a flush. About the only hands it's really horrible to check against here are 55 and 77, and with your opponent calling on a drawy flop 3-ways oop that's unlikely.

On the other hand, lets say we have [2d][2h] and the flop comes [2s][9c][Ac] flop and the turn comes [Tc]. It's pretty obvious we absolutely have to get it in here. We can't check the turn because there are a ton of aces in his range which we can both get value out of and we don't want to let spike a free club, and the board just turned a very likely two pair for both T9 and AT. So this is an easy bet/call as there's a ton more value in a turn bet here, there's a much greater chance we'll be outdrawn if we check, and there's several two pair hands which are going to try to get it in against us on the turn here.

Anyways, I tried to choose two extreme examples and your hand obviously falls somewhere in between. My default would be to bet/call against a total unknown here, but if I knew my opponent was a regular who folded to 80%+ flop bets I would be checking behind here always.
The better player should win the race. Always.
User avatar
DoctorHandles
 
Posts: 2401
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

Postby T-Rod » Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:16 am

I don't see why we are calling his CRAI in this hand.

I like DH's post about his hands where we have 2[d] 2[h] and the board goes 2[s] 9[c] A[c] and T[c] so we bet/call there because of the Ace and lots of two pairs.


But on this board there are not many two pair combinations in a raised pot. I can't think of one. Also, we have 2nd bottom set so we lose to most sets. Do we think he does this very often wtih the A[s] at 50NL?
User avatar
T-Rod
 
Posts: 5794
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Next

Return to No Limit Hold'em Cash Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

cron