the river & the fish

[euri10]

I went to the following debate in my little head and dont find any clear answer, or really simple solution
I go often to the crucial choice when I have the nuts on the river to gain the maximum against my opponent.
do u think it is preferable to bet pot with the nuts, half pot, 1/3 pot etc....
briefly what are your plans with that and how consequeltly do you manage your bets on the river when you are not sure to hold the nuts against a solid opponent who could play back at you...

[Xaston]

A lot of it depends on what you had your opponent on on the turn, what hit on the river, how big are the 2 stack sizes, how big is the pot, who has position, what do you know about your opponent, and what does your opponent think of you?

[Xaston]

If your opponent is bad, and the board was paired on the turn, you have to assume they have a smaller full house. If that is the case you can probably get in a big bet.

If the board had 3 spades on the turn and you had a set and hit a full house on the river, they prolly had the flush and are scared of the board pairing. Now you're gonna have to throw out a small bet.

What size do you play? I really doubt you're gonna find any good players "playing back at you" on the river with nothing. If they are raising you theres a 98% chance they just have a huge hand. There are very few people under $400 PLO that are gonna be tricky enough for that.

Are you or your opponents very shallow now? Then your decision is easy, bet it all.

[Kuso]