by CybrPunk » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:13 pm
I think the way you play these pairs changes drastically as your position at the table changes. UTG and UTG+1 these hands just aren't hands I would push at a full table. If we were short handed and I had the effective position of MP or later this would change, but at a full table you're more likely to run into hands that would look you up ranging from overpairs that dominate you 3:1 to overcards that you're only a slight favorite against. True, you need to take some gambles and coinflips to make it deep into most tournaments but I don't like pushing 66-88 in EP at a full table. I prefer to push and exploit my edges where I think that I'm a 60:40 favorite and with these medium pairs I just don't see that sizable edge from UTG and UTG+1.
Take the following pokerstove results against a somewhat loose range of the top 20% of hands calling you. You're even money here and thus this move is neutral to slightly negative EV. Following are results for 99-QQ which are better for this move in this position.
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 50.9433 % 50.52% 00.42% { 66+, A4s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
Hand 2: 49.0567 % 48.63% 00.42% { 88-66 }
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 37.9620 % 37.47% 00.49% { 66+, A4s+, K8s+, Q9s+, J9s+, T9s, A9o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
Hand 2: 62.0380 % 61.54% 00.49% { QQ-99 }
If we narrow the calling range down to the top 10% of hands this is clearly now a -EV move and now 99-QQ become only a 55:45 favorite to win.
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 57.4643 % 57.13% 00.34% { 88+, A9s+, KTs+, QTs+, AJo+, KQo }
Hand 2: 42.5357 % 42.20% 00.34% { 88-66 }
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 45.3660 % 44.70% 00.67% { 88+, A9s+, KTs+, QTs+, AJo+, KQo }
Hand 2: 54.6340 % 53.96% 00.67% { QQ-99 }
Based on these calculations I would say that medium pairs are not good hands to push in EP at a full table.